View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
simonsezdothis
Joined: 23 Nov 2005 Posts: 71 Location: New Zealand |
Posted: Sat May 16, 2009 1:38 am Post subject: RTI Trigger Codes - won't decode. |
|
|
Has anyone had any experience with RTI Trigger Codes?
I'm using a URC 8910(B02) and an RTI RP6 Controller.
I have Macro's and RS232 Commands stored in the RP6 and use the trigger codes to fire everything from my URC8910.
The RTI Trigger Codes won't decode with IR Tool.
I am currently using them as learned codes, but have run out of memory.
Here's a text file of the RTI Codes. (I'm not using all of these - but this is the report generated from the RTI Program "Integration Designer"
http://www.hifi-remote.com/forums/dload.php?action=file&file_id=6730
Interested to hear if anyone else is using an RTI Controller like this, (ie ... without an RTI remote) or if these codes can be decoded somehow.
(Am I right also, that it is not possible to create a key move with a learned code? - I could have saved some memory that way as there are common commands across devices. System Off for example)
Cheers
Peter |
|
Back to top |
|
|
simonsezdothis
Joined: 23 Nov 2005 Posts: 71 Location: New Zealand |
Posted: Sat May 16, 2009 2:38 am Post subject: RTI Triggers |
|
|
Hi.
Sorry ... I should mention I am not using an extender with the URC8910, as I couldn't see how to Un-install it if I needed the Learning functions again.
Cheers
Peter |
|
Back to top |
|
|
johnsfine Site Admin
Joined: 10 Aug 2003 Posts: 4766 Location: Bedford, MA |
Posted: Sat May 16, 2009 6:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
It is very easy to uninstall the extender to use learning again. Choose one of these ways (based on whether the JP1 cable is handy when you want to start learning):
In all cases, it is a good idea to have already saved a file on your PC from ir.exe with your 8910 configuration before you installed the extender and another with your latest configuration including the extender.
1) Without JP1 cable before learning (you''l still need it after learning): Remove a battery, press any key, replace the battery, do the normal factory reset.
2) With JP1 cable before and after learning: Upload the configuration you saved before you installed the extender.
Either way, you probably then want to:
Learn some signals.
Download the learned signals to the PC.
Decode Them.
Edit the saved configuration with extender to use information from those decodes.
Upload that configuration back to the 8910 and reactivate the extender.
None of that does you any good until we can give you a protocol executor for your RTI signals so you could use the extender. I'm on the wrong computer this morning to even look at that. Usually Rob gets to such things much faster than I do anyway. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Capn Trips Expert
Joined: 03 Oct 2003 Posts: 3990
|
Posted: Sat May 16, 2009 6:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
If you read the Extender FAQ, you will see that to uninstall the extender, you just remove a battery, press a button, re-install the battery, and conduct a 981 reset (or "MFR Reset" on the 8910).
You should be able to decode those codes using IRTool _________________ Beginners - Read this thread first
READ BEFORE POSTING or your post will be DELETED!
Remotes: OFA XSight Touch, AR XSight Touch
TVs: LG 65" Smart LED TV; Samsung QN850BF Series - 8K UHD Neo QLED LCD TV
RCVR: Onkyo TX-SR875; Integra DTR 40.3
DVD/VCR: Pioneer DV-400VK (multi-region DVD), Sony BDP-S350 (Blu-ray), Toshiba HD-A3 (HD-DVD), Panasonic AG-W1 (Multi-system VCR);
Laserdisc: Pioneer CLD-D704.
Amazon Firestick
tape deck: Pioneer CT 1380WR (double cassette deck)
(But I still have to get up for my beer) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
johnsfine Site Admin
Joined: 10 Aug 2003 Posts: 4766 Location: Bedford, MA |
Posted: Sat May 16, 2009 10:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
You can't decode these with IrTool until I add this protocol to DecodeIr.dll
All those signal look phase encoded with no lead in nor other glitches. I manually checked the phase pattern on the first signal and it is consistent with phase encoding (a random pattern of mainly 0010 with some 0020 would look like phase encoding but be inconsistent when you check the actual phase pattern).
DecodeIr.dll is supposed to have a generic phase decoder, that does that phase check and does a partial decode for anything that passes the phase check. It isn't doing so for these signals. I don't know why. I don't recall ever seeing phase encoded signals this long. Maybe there is some limit set too low in DecodeIr.dll. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
The Robman Site Owner
Joined: 01 Aug 2003 Posts: 21271 Location: Chicago, IL |
Posted: Sat May 16, 2009 2:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This is a 9 1/2 byte signal where the last byte is the OBC (in lsb format) and the preceding byte is the complement of it.
When decoding by hand, be aware that the signal starts with a 0 so the first pair starts with an off time, which you can't actually see.
I've been trying to build an upgrade for this all morning but it's just not working. We're supposed to be able to generate 10 byte signals but I think we're tripping a limit here somehow. _________________ Rob
www.hifi-remote.com
Please don't PM me with remote questions, post them in the forums so all the experts can help! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mr_d_p_gumby Expert
Joined: 03 Aug 2003 Posts: 1370 Location: Newbury Park, CA |
Posted: Sat May 16, 2009 3:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The Robman wrote: | I've been trying to build an upgrade for this all morning but it's just not working. We're supposed to be able to generate 10 byte signals but I think we're tripping a limit here somehow. | Possibly you are exceeding the IR engine bit buffer size: Code: | HCS08 ......... 80 bits
S3C8 .......... 64 bits
SST ........... 48 bits
6805-RC16/18 .. 48 bits
P8/740 ........ 48 bits
6805-C9 ....... 40 bits |
_________________ Mike England |
|
Back to top |
|
|
simonsezdothis
Joined: 23 Nov 2005 Posts: 71 Location: New Zealand |
Posted: Sat May 16, 2009 5:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Guys.
OK ... I get it now with the extender. That looks like a very useful feature.
Without asking too much, (cos i probably wont understand the answer!) I can see the 9 1/2 byte thing, but cant understand why there are 4 different types of burst pairs. I have only seen 2 previously representing 0 and 1. Am I on the wrong track here?
0010 0010
0010 0020
0020 0010
0020 0020
cheers
P |
|
Back to top |
|
|
The Robman Site Owner
Joined: 01 Aug 2003 Posts: 21271 Location: Chicago, IL |
Posted: Sat May 16, 2009 7:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There are only really 2 burst pairs:
+0010 -0010 and
-0010 +0010
When you see a 0020 pair, it's because two similar pairs occurred back to back (which happens when the binary changes from 1 to 0 and vice versa).
This is a 76 bit signal, so I am indeed tripping the 64 bit limit (which I didn't know existed before now). I might be able to do the signal in two parts. _________________ Rob
www.hifi-remote.com
Please don't PM me with remote questions, post them in the forums so all the experts can help! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
The Robman Site Owner
Joined: 01 Aug 2003 Posts: 21271 Location: Chicago, IL |
Posted: Sat May 16, 2009 11:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I spent a lot of time trying to do this in two parts and I got very close, but not close enough, so for the first time ever, I'm giving up, I can't create an upgrade for the RTI.
For those that are interested in how I was trying to do it, I split the signal into four 7 bit segments and six 8 bit segments. I tried to send the first part using just the fixed data and the second part using just the variable data, but it proved impossible to get the first part to have a zero leadout time. _________________ Rob
www.hifi-remote.com
Please don't PM me with remote questions, post them in the forums so all the experts can help! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
simonsezdothis
Joined: 23 Nov 2005 Posts: 71 Location: New Zealand |
Posted: Sun May 17, 2009 2:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for your efforts on this. I really do appreciate what you're doing here.
Am I right in assuming that it still may be possible to create this upgrade, for a "JP1" remote that uses the HCS08 processor?
If this is the case, I'm happy to simply buy one that will do what I need it to do.
Would that help? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
The Robman Site Owner
Joined: 01 Aug 2003 Posts: 21271 Location: Chicago, IL |
Posted: Sun May 17, 2009 8:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
If Mike is right that the HCS08 remotes can handle signals up to 80 bits, then yes, they should be able to handle this 76 bit signal. Let me see if I can get an upgrade working in one of my URC-8820s then you can buy it from me. _________________ Rob
www.hifi-remote.com
Please don't PM me with remote questions, post them in the forums so all the experts can help! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
simonsezdothis
Joined: 23 Nov 2005 Posts: 71 Location: New Zealand |
Posted: Sun May 17, 2009 4:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Rob ... that'd be great.
I've been looking at the HCS08 Remotes, and the 8820 would have been my pick. Happy to buy one (or two) from you.
Would you know which processor the URC7781 (stealth 12?) has, and if it's JP1 compatible. (this is available locally) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
The Robman Site Owner
Joined: 01 Aug 2003 Posts: 21271 Location: Chicago, IL |
Posted: Mon May 18, 2009 10:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Good news, the HCS08 version does indeed work. I have learned the signals from my URC-8820 remote using my URC-8910 remote so you can test them. I have added notes showing what each learned button does in the following file:
http://www.hifi-remote.com/forums/dload.php?action=file&file_id=6743
Please load it into your URC-8910 and test it, if it works it confirms that the HCS08 upgrade works. I've already confirmed that it matches the pronto hex. _________________ Rob
www.hifi-remote.com
Please don't PM me with remote questions, post them in the forums so all the experts can help! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
simonsezdothis
Joined: 23 Nov 2005 Posts: 71 Location: New Zealand |
Posted: Tue May 19, 2009 5:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Rob - good news indeed - they all work perfectly.
Well Done!
Let me know the cost etc for the 8820's etc.
THANKS !!
Now that this is possible, I'm sure it will be of use to others too.
Cheers
Peter |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|