RemoteMaster v1.83 is now available!

gfb107 · Post by **gfb107** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 8:37 pm

I've built and released RemoteMaster v1.83
Available downloads are:

RemoteMaster.v1.83.zip - Multi-platform Java program, works on Windows, Linux, etc.. Requires a Java 1.5 or newer runtime environment.
RemoteMaster.v1.83_Setup.exe - Windows 32-bit standalone application. Note: You must follow steps 4 and 5 of the installation instructions

Changes for v1.83

Fix for using custom function names
Make RM terminate when closed
RMIR: enable other port entry in port selection dialog
Update digitmaps through 430
Fix support for device type specific images

Links:
The RemoteMaster project home page, now accepting donations.
RemoteMaster.v1.83.zip
RemoteMaster.v1.83_Setup.exe - See note below.
Change Log (also included in the ZIP file)
Readme.html (also included in the ZIP file)

Note: Even with the stand-alone Windows version, you must follow steps 4 and 5 of the installation instructions.

Post by **vickyg2003** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 9:09 pm

Make RM terminate when closed

Is that going to make it so that RM isn't still holding on to things, requiring a reboot before you can remove files from the RDF area?

gfb107 · Post by **gfb107** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:35 pm

It should

mdavej · Post by **mdavej** » Mon Feb 04, 2008 4:06 pm

Is there a complete list of generic button names RM reads from the RDF files?

gfb107 · Post by **gfb107** » Mon Feb 04, 2008 6:45 pm

RM itself doesn't care what the buttons name are, either the generic names or the actual names.

However, consistency between RDFs and with KM is a good thing, since it allows for better behavior when importing KM upgrades and when switching remotes.

The correct answer is "whatever KM uses", but that may not be helpful.

I think there's a fairly complete list in this thread, but I'll do some more looking and get back to you if I find a better list.

mdavej · Post by **mdavej** » Tue Feb 05, 2008 9:29 am

Perfect. No need to look further. Thanks.

binky123 · Post by **binky123** » Sun Feb 10, 2008 9:40 am

Hi Greg,
When you get a chance for the next release of RM, can you allow the S3F80 remote type to use the S3C80 device combiner(Pid 01 44). Thanks.

gfb107 · Post by **gfb107** » Sun Feb 10, 2008 12:13 pm

It's on the to-do list.

Capn Trips · Post by **Capn Trips** » Wed Mar 05, 2008 11:36 am

Greg,

A feature request for RM. KM has a "Protocol Help" worksheet that frequently contatins valuable helpful information about how to utilize a particular variant or choose from a family of protocol executors.

Would it be possible to have the text that appears in KM's Protocol Help be available in the Protocol Notes pane in RM?

I recognize that sometimes the specific implementation in RM is more intuitive than in KM and some of those notes would not apply, but the general information about relationships within families of protocol executors (like the HK Combo "Help" describing its relationship to NEC, the explanantions for Sony, NEC and Pioneer that compares and contrasts related variants in the same place, etc.) I find VERY useful and frequently KM is the only ready reference for this info, even when I'm using RM.

johnsfine · Post by **johnsfine** » Wed Mar 05, 2008 1:06 pm

RM has its version of protocol help defined in the protocols.ini entry for each protocol.

If someone wants to edit a copy of protocols.ini and improve some of those, I expect Greg would be happy to check those changes into the official copy of RemoteMaster.

I think I still have CVS write access to the project, so if you prefer to email proposed changes to protocols.ini to me, I'd be glad to review the differences (easy with Winmerge) and if they are OK commit them to SourceForge CVS.

You can easily use the protocol help in KM as a guide in any protocol for which you think it is better than the existing protocol notes in RM.

gfb107 · Post by **gfb107** » Wed Mar 05, 2008 2:55 pm

johnsfine wrote:If someone wants to edit a copy of protocols.ini and improve some of those, I expect Greg would be happy to check those changes into the official copy of RemoteMaster.

Absolutely! I'd love to have help maintaining protocols.ini.
In fact, anyone can get read/write access to the RM source at sourceforge. I think I have to approve the requests for someone to join the project as a developer, but after that you would be able to submit your changes directly.

Capn Trips · Post by **Capn Trips** » Wed Mar 05, 2008 5:06 pm

OK - I'll give a shot at "improving" several of the "Notes=" sections for some of the protocols over the next few days.

e34m5 · Post by **e34m5** » Thu Mar 06, 2008 6:07 am

When I open RM it messages that images are missing with a JAVA error.

Might be nice to make that if it does not find the image to simply have a normal message box come up.

The first time I used I couldn't figure out why it wouldn't run until I noticed there was an error dialog hiding behind the RM.

johnsfine · Post by **johnsfine** » Thu Mar 06, 2008 8:03 am

Capn Trips wrote:"improving"

Sorry. I didn't look at the file before posting to this thread. Long ago I wrote a bunch of notes sections and put them in protocols.ini and I've noticed several times when Greg correctly or incorrectly copied notes from KM to protocols.ini, so I somehow had the mistaken impression that most of the entries had some kind of notes.

When you put quotes around "improving" I guessed that you meant most entries have no notes at all. I just looked at the file and was surprised to see that is the case.

I did not mean to understate the task of "improving" them.

Capn Trips · Post by **Capn Trips** » Thu Mar 06, 2008 9:00 am

Actually, I put "improving" in quotes because judging whether a particular edit is an improvement is very subjective.

Quite frankly, most of the ones that have no Notes don't really need them (imho). Those protocols that are stand-alone or really self-evident (like Emerson, Mitsubishi, Pace, Proton) I will have nothing to offer. It's the ones where there are families of related protocols (Kaseikyo/Fujitsu/SharpDVD; the NEC family; the Pioneer Family; etc.) where I personally feel the Notes can be improved such that if you choose ONE of the related protocols, one could be made aware of and/or guided to a more appropriate variant with a well-crafted note.

Like I said, I'll give that a go and see if you guys think it's helpful.