Extra IR blasters for 9910 base ?
Moderator: Moderators
-
zaphod7501
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 7:07 pm
- Location: Peoria Illinois
lifeisfun , I don't think the location would be a problem , the local Home Theater people do it all the time (not much different than taping it to the outside of the cabinet 1/4"). Direct sunlight would be more likely to damage the detector and I've never heard of that happening.
Just call me Zaphod (or Steve) --- I never should have started using numbers in a screen name but I just can't stop now.
-
zaphod7501
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 7:07 pm
- Location: Peoria Illinois
The function of the Xantech box could be duplicated with a small power supply , some resistors and a transistor. The exact values of all the parts and the circuit design would be determined by the parts you rounded up. Assuming you didn't just dismount the internal LED's and attach them to long lead wires the first thing you would do is locate some LED's and use their characteristics to design the rest of the unit.
Using the Xantech box and LED's left only the trigger method to determine. It wouldn't be a terribly difficult electronic project but some basic knowledge of transistor circuits would be helpfull.
Using the Xantech box and LED's left only the trigger method to determine. It wouldn't be a terribly difficult electronic project but some basic knowledge of transistor circuits would be helpfull.
Just call me Zaphod (or Steve) --- I never should have started using numbers in a screen name but I just can't stop now.
-
Tommy Tyler
- Expert
- Posts: 411
- Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2003 11:48 am
- Location: Denver mountains
SilentBob,
By virtue of an 8910 base station kindly donated by MaskedMan for me to analyze, I'm finishing up an article now that will tell you everything you need to know to add "blasters" to this unit without additional power supplies, transistors, etc. Hope you can hold off spending more $ for just a little bit.
Tommy
By virtue of an 8910 base station kindly donated by MaskedMan for me to analyze, I'm finishing up an article now that will tell you everything you need to know to add "blasters" to this unit without additional power supplies, transistors, etc. Hope you can hold off spending more $ for just a little bit.
Tommy
-
Tommy Tyler
- Expert
- Posts: 411
- Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2003 11:48 am
- Location: Denver mountains
-
Tommy Tyler
- Expert
- Posts: 411
- Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2003 11:48 am
- Location: Denver mountains
Well, xantech is making box that works with most manufacturers :
http://www.xantech.com/products/p_folder/p_794797.htm
http://www.xantech.com/products/p_folder/p_794797.htm
-
zaphod7501
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 7:07 pm
- Location: Peoria Illinois
If you notice they offer 14 different modules to match different brand types (and they don't even mention the Sony Control-S - 2 types, Control-T, or LANC interfaces specifically).
Most of the Sony interfaces use what looks like a remote control signal with the 40-60 Khz carrier stripped out. I can do some experimenting next week to see if I can hardwire a remote to a Control-S jack and get a unit to operate . A big problem is that the Sony control signal is bi-directional and I don't know what will happen with a uni-directional device is attached, hopefully it won't care.
Most of the Sony interfaces use what looks like a remote control signal with the 40-60 Khz carrier stripped out. I can do some experimenting next week to see if I can hardwire a remote to a Control-S jack and get a unit to operate . A big problem is that the Sony control signal is bi-directional and I don't know what will happen with a uni-directional device is attached, hopefully it won't care.
Just call me Zaphod (or Steve) --- I never should have started using numbers in a screen name but I just can't stop now.
Did you see the instruction manual ?
http://www.xantech.com/products/i_folder/i_794_797.pdf
I think the only difference is the supplied cable....
http://www.xantech.com/products/i_folder/i_794_797.pdf
I think the only difference is the supplied cable....
-
zaphod7501
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 7:07 pm
- Location: Peoria Illinois
Well , the 794 uses 7 dip switches to select output type while the 797 does some internal selection but uses 7 interface modules to match units , as I read it. I have some ideas on a general method that might work. Some interfaces, like Sony Control-T, will probably not be readily compatible with JP1 remote, others might by filtering the carrier out. Sony had a series of console TV's that used a chip directly from a remote control that had the carrier wave stripped off for front panel controls to simplify a very long cable run. Using this method may allow direct connection to a control jack. Each remote frequency may require a different filter (hence the multiple switches and modules with Xantech).
Creating a single filter adapter might work by changing the frequency on custom upgrades. For example use a 48Khz filter and change the upgrade to 48Khz for that device instead of the correct one. After stripping the carrier the data should be correct then. I will do some research and testing this week to see if I can achieve a direct connection on Sony equipment.
Creating a single filter adapter might work by changing the frequency on custom upgrades. For example use a 48Khz filter and change the upgrade to 48Khz for that device instead of the correct one. After stripping the carrier the data should be correct then. I will do some research and testing this week to see if I can achieve a direct connection on Sony equipment.
Just call me Zaphod (or Steve) --- I never should have started using numbers in a screen name but I just can't stop now.