View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
fichmana2003
Joined: 30 Dec 2003 Posts: 49
|
Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2004 8:42 pm Post subject: Thomson protocol and KM |
|
|
Is it possible to add the Thomson protocol to KM, for us european-devices bound users? I know RM does Thomson (and I used it), but it doesn't do Device-Combiner, and having to use both for doing one upgrade is cumbersome...
10x _________________ alexf |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mark Pierson Expert
Joined: 03 Aug 2003 Posts: 3017 Location: Connecticut, USA |
Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2004 8:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's on my to-do list, but I don't know when I'll get to it. _________________ Mark |
|
Back to top |
|
|
johnsfine Site Admin
Joined: 10 Aug 2003 Posts: 4766 Location: Bedford, MA |
Posted: Sat Jan 17, 2004 8:32 am Post subject: Re: Thomson protocol and KM |
|
|
fichmana2003 wrote: | I know RM does Thomson (and I used it), but it doesn't do Device-Combiner, and having to use both for doing one upgrade is cumbersome... |
For device combiner, I think using both for one upgrade is easier. I'd use it that way even if KM supported the base protocol, maybe even if RM supported Device-combiner.
Device combiner requires that you get the fixed data and EFC codes from elsewhere. It can't do device to fixed data translation, nor OBC to EFC translation. I like to have both the base upgrade and the device combiner open at once, so I can see or even change OBC numbers. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fichmana2003
Joined: 30 Dec 2003 Posts: 49
|
Posted: Sat Jan 17, 2004 4:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | For device combiner, I think using both for one upgrade is easier. I'd use it that way even if KM supported the base protocol, maybe even if RM supported Device-combiner. |
Good advice, John. Now that I actually did use both, I can say it has some advantages. I had both open and copy/pasting between them. Now if only I had a dual-head monitor setup, everything would be perfect... _________________ alexf |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|