Moderator: Moderators
Shake it Earl...eferz wrote:After all, my milk shake brings all the boys to the yard. Totally don't know what that means but thought I'd throw it in there for funsees.
Haha! That's awesome, "Damn right, it's better than yours."The Robman wrote:Shake it Earl...
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.p ... the%20yard
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pGL2rytTraA&ob=av2e
Used the JP1 tools to create the respective files from the aforementioned UEI upgrade. BIN file Instructions. Rob, question about this upgrade. I wonder if it is intentional for the notes to indicate, "CBL/2889 is the official UEI setup code" yet the setup code in the protocol parameters lists, "1889".The Robman wrote:Here's the official UEI upgrade...
http://www.hifi-remote.com/forums/dload ... e_id=10801
Efrez, most remotes can't handle 2889 as a setup code, but the newer ones can, so we'd need to make it into a lower number to work on 99% of the Jp1 remotes.I wonder if it is intentional for the notes to indicate, "CBL/2889 is the official UEI setup code" yet the setup code in the protocol parameters lists, "1889".
Contrary to what you might think, I do not know the answer to that question. However, I do have the ability to record the output of the Slingbox. So, I used the JP1 tools to create the following file from the HUMAX iHD-FOX C (UEI) upgrade which Rob created.vickyg2003 wrote:Efrez, do the slingbox irblasters have a frequency rating? I believe that the frequency might be a problem. 56K is quite a high frequency.
Ahh, that makes sense since RM has a hard limit to 2047. I was thinking it could have been a typo in the notes section.vickyg2003 wrote:Efrez, most remotes can't handle 2889 as a setup code, but the newer ones can, so we'd need to make it into a lower number to work on 99% of the Jp1 remotes.
The last set of learns were recorded using IR Scope & Widget from the IR Blaster of the Slingbox Pro-HD with the HUMAX iHD-FOX C (UEI) upgrade bin files installed.3FG wrote:These learns are very close to the first learns that you did from a remote (not the Widget), but not identical. I wouldn't think the differences are significant, but we could try fiddling with the timing.
I would like to confirm whether these learns were taken with a remote, and if so is it the same remote used in the first learns.
I'm guessing the third "50KHz" in your last statement was a typo and meant to be "56KHz" but all in all I'm not sure how it affects its compatibility. Other than having bnordman check the functionality of his IR blasters and to enlist others to test out the upgrade, is there anything else that I can do to help?3FG wrote:The learns from the Harmony showed a frequency of 50KHz, while these show nearer to 56KHz. I'm pretty sure that the 50KHz number is an artifact of the way the Widget works, but since the new learns show 50KHz, it argues that the signals sent by the Harmony and the Slingbox are different, although maybe not by much.
Does this mean turning your revised device upgrade into bin files would be a moot point? Or do you think there's a possibility for different results?vickyg2003 wrote:I updated my files to correct the toggle frame to start at the second frame if the button is being held, but this wouldn't matter to the sling user.
Once we have bnordman's confiirmation thateferz wrote:Other than having bnordman check the functionality of his IR blasters and to enlist others to test out the upgrade, is there anything else that I can do to help?
No this would be moot. The slingbox is only going to do the two frames, the initial and the toggle. It was only going to be a problem with remotes where the first frame would repeat, until the button was released, which was incorrect.Does this mean turning your revised device upgrade into bin files would be a moot point? Or do you think there's a possibility for different results?vickyg2003 wrote:I updated my files to correct the toggle frame to start at the second frame if the button is being held, but this wouldn't matter to the sling user.
1) Yes they are workingvickyg2003 wrote: Once we have bnordman's confiirmation that
1) the IRBlaster is actually working
2) there isn't any kind of repeater in the mix,
3) he has tried both the official and my upgrades,
then we can start tweaking the protocol to try and get it to match some learns, but which learns to match them to is the big question. We went through this with a drapery control a few months ago, and it was very frustrating. Now we have a situation with this remote and several different variations of the signal.
Okay, that one matches Rob's RMDU for the offical UEI upgrade which I then turned into a bin file.bnordman wrote:for 3)
I tested:
http://www.hifi-remote.com/forums/dload ... e_id=10802
No button performed any visible action at the Kabel (BW) cable box
You could not have tested that file because its an ICT file from IR Scope. It is a recording of the IR Signals emitted by my Slingbox and is not compatible with Sling's tools. There's no way it would have uploaded into the Slingbox as the Setup Assistant does not have the capacity to input a filename.bnordman wrote:I also tested:
http://www.hifi-remote.com/forums/dload ... e_id=10803
Same results, no reaction of the Slingbox.
Am I missing any files that I need to test?