Sorry for the confusion. Eferz said it very well, but I'll try to clarify a bit more. The lookup tool didn't lead to a file. The other info you gave me lead to the file (you said you had a samsung and were using setup code xyz). The lookup tool confirmed I was on the right track (same protocol info). In general, the lookup tool is used primarily to find a compatible setup code. In your case, we already knew the code, so we used the lookup tool to find the protocol info so that we could throw out any files that didn't match. We still had to find the file using educated guesses because we currently have no way to go directly from lookup tool to file.TMPLee wrote:Here's what you wrote a couple of messages earlier ...mdavej wrote:You search for a file by mfg name here first, download what you think might be the closest match according to the model number or file date. The lookup tool is then used to find a built-in setup code that will work with the EFCs you found in the file. The lookup tool doesn't lead to the file, the lookup tool leads to a compatible setup code.
I think there are links to all the gory details on the wiki site at the top of this page.
"I used the lookup tool to search for your code and noted the resulting protocol and device/subdevice. Then I did a file search for samsung."
T'ain't what you just wrote-- I'm going to read the wiki (and other things referenced there) again slowly, but what you just wrote now squares better with how I understand things work. But be patient with me, if you can -- it'll take awhile!
This gets a little OT, but brings up something I hadn't thought of before. I think Rob keeps a list of all the files searchable by protocol, mfg, etc. Maybe Vicky used this to help build the lookup tool database. It would be nice if we could search the file section directly by protocol, without having to download Rob's list and without Rob having to maintain it. Maybe have everyone who uploads a file provide the protocol info or have some code that looks in the file and fills it in automatically.
Doing this would be extra work for everyone and would really only benefit those who don't use JP1. Does anyone think this is useful or worthwhile and if so, how to implement it?