New Remotes
Moderator: Moderators
-
vickyg2003
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7109
- Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 12:19 pm
- Location: Florida
- Contact:
New Remotes
I hear that we are close to having another family of remotes to have to support that is going to be using yet another assembler language.
Do we have a PDF manual for the new assembly language?
Also what remotes are going to be using this? I'd like to keep an eye out for a "deal" so that I can pick up a remote to be able to test protocols when the time comes.
Do we have a PDF manual for the new assembly language?
Also what remotes are going to be using this? I'd like to keep an eye out for a "deal" so that I can pick up a remote to be able to test protocols when the time comes.
Re: New Remotes
...and more importantly, are these new remotes pretty?
Remotes; JP1.2: Comcast URC-1067, JP1.3: Insignia NS-RC02U-10A, JP1.4 OARI06G, JP2.1: Cox URC-8820-MOTO (still trying to figure out how to make them self-aware.)
-
The Robman
- Site Owner
- Posts: 21984
- Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2003 9:37 am
- Location: Chicago, IL
- Contact:
The new remotes are all JP2 remotes, so we haven't even sorted out how we're going to support them from a connection POV, let alone from a protocol upgrade POV.
But, to your question, the new processor is a Maxim MAXQ610.
The main page for the processor is here:
http://www.maxim-ic.com/datasheet/index.mvp/id/5939
The document that includes the assembler language is this one, the section that you'll want to look at is Section 14 (starting on page 168, with details on page 170)
http://pdfserv.maxim-ic.com/en/an/AN4812.pdf
But, to your question, the new processor is a Maxim MAXQ610.
The main page for the processor is here:
http://www.maxim-ic.com/datasheet/index.mvp/id/5939
The document that includes the assembler language is this one, the section that you'll want to look at is Section 14 (starting on page 168, with details on page 170)
http://pdfserv.maxim-ic.com/en/an/AN4812.pdf
Last edited by The Robman on Fri Oct 14, 2011 1:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Rob
www.hifi-remote.com
Please don't PM me with remote questions, post them in the forums so all the experts can help!
www.hifi-remote.com
Please don't PM me with remote questions, post them in the forums so all the experts can help!
This application note is useful for understanding the details of how the prefix instruction works. The MAXQ family is said to be the only commercially available transaction triggered processor. Technically, it has only one instruction (MOVE), and the sources and destinations determine the actions taken. It is different!
Additionally, it is a 16 bit processor and code runs in word (16 bit) addressing mode, while data can be read/written in byte or word mode, so that is also a departure from the 8 bit chips we're used to.
Additionally, it is a 16 bit processor and code runs in word (16 bit) addressing mode, while data can be read/written in byte or word mode, so that is also a departure from the 8 bit chips we're used to.
-
vickyg2003
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7109
- Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 12:19 pm
- Location: Florida
- Contact:
.The_Robman wrote:The new remotes are all JP2 remotes, so we haven't even sorted out how we're going to support them from a connection POV, let alone from a protocol upgrade POV
While I was reading the other assembly manuals, I thought it would be a good time to give the new language a first look.
Thanks Dave, that does look like it will be difficult to get a handle on.3fg wrote:The MAXQ family is said to be the only commercially available transaction triggered processor. Technically, it has only one instruction (MOVE), and the sources and destinations determine the actions taken. It is different!
You must have been reading about my feeling that Atlases are ugly..Eferz wrote: ...and more importantly, are these new remotes pretty?
Remember to provide feedback to let us know how the problem was solved and share your upgrades.
Tip: When creating an upgrade, always include ALL functions from the oem remote, even if you never plan on assigning them to a button. Complete function lists makes an upgrade more helpful to others.
Tip: When creating an upgrade, always include ALL functions from the oem remote, even if you never plan on assigning them to a button. Complete function lists makes an upgrade more helpful to others.
-
vickyg2003
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7109
- Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 12:19 pm
- Location: Florida
- Contact:
-
The Robman
- Site Owner
- Posts: 21984
- Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2003 9:37 am
- Location: Chicago, IL
- Contact:
The Xsight remotes have a USB connector, rather than a traditional 6-pin, and nobody has taken the time to figure out how to communicate with them yet, so we don't know what processor they use.madmalkav wrote:A little off-topic: any idea if the Xsight series uses this very same processor? I want to know mainly because if some day I try to figure how it works internally and get some usb logs, dumps, or whatever.
Rob
www.hifi-remote.com
Please don't PM me with remote questions, post them in the forums so all the experts can help!
www.hifi-remote.com
Please don't PM me with remote questions, post them in the forums so all the experts can help!
Yes we didyakpimp wrote:I got a remote yesterday that has the MAXQ610 chip, and I was wondering if you guys ever got your hands on a couple to see what can and can't be done.
Do keep us informed. At present we need all the users that have remotes with the Maxim chip to assist us in testing and development, as they are so different from the JP1.x remotes that a full understanding of them is still a long way off.
Graham
The remote is not a universal, it's the new xbox 360 media remote
http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com ... 2986bb.jpg
I'm going to try to get pictures of the insides tonight. I did look at it a couple days ago, and didn't see any pads for programming. I assume i'll have to connect directly to the chip pins.
[/img]
http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com ... 2986bb.jpg
I'm going to try to get pictures of the insides tonight. I did look at it a couple days ago, and didn't see any pads for programming. I assume i'll have to connect directly to the chip pins.
[/img]
Yes, if it weren't for them then JP1 wouldn't exist.yakpimp wrote:Sorry I'm not familiar with UEI, I assume you mean Universal Electronics Inc?
Remotes; JP1.2: Comcast URC-1067, JP1.3: Insignia NS-RC02U-10A, JP1.4 OARI06G, JP2.1: Cox URC-8820-MOTO (still trying to figure out how to make them self-aware.)