Converting Protocol from URC9910 to Comcast 1067 b1

This is the JP1 beginners forum. There's no such thing as a stupid question in here, so post away, but this forum is just for JP1 users and people considering JP1, non-JP1 users please use the appropriate forum above!

Moderator: Moderators

Chester
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 9:44 am

Post by Chester »

binky123 wrote:He has to take the original PB file and regenerate the protocol for the HCS08 processor. After that he may have to adjust the 2nd byte of the HCS08 protocol executor.
Yes that is what I did but the second byte in the generated protocol is 12
and Rob said to change to 15 and that works
Now will it always be the same for all generated HSC08 protocols
The Robman
Site Owner
Posts: 22056
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2003 9:37 am
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:

Post by The Robman »

I'm guessing that the OFFSET (ie, 3) will be consistent, not the numbers themselves, so if the generated value was "15" the correct value would probably be "18", etc.
Rob
www.hifi-remote.com
Please don't PM me with remote questions, post them in the forums so all the experts can help!
Chester
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 9:44 am

Post by Chester »

The Robman wrote:I'm guessing that the OFFSET (ie, 3) will be consistent, not the numbers themselves, so if the generated value was "15" the correct value would probably be "18", etc.
Ok If I find different I will post
mr_d_p_gumby
Expert
Posts: 1370
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2003 12:13 am
Location: Newbury Park, CA

Post by mr_d_p_gumby »

The Robman wrote:I'm guessing that the OFFSET (ie, 3) will be consistent, not the numbers themselves, so if the generated value was "15" the correct value would probably be "18", etc.
Yes, the bug will cause the offset to be 3 less than it should be, so adding 3 to it should be correct. It'll be fixed in the next version of PB (honest, there will be one :P ).
Post Reply