Does RDF for URC8060 (KAMEMAK0) have a problem?

If you have a new remote that isn't recognized by RMIR, post the details here so we can help create a new RDF for it. Or, if there is an issue with an existing RDF or map, this is the place.
Post Reply
t_for_tango
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 11:07 pm

Does RDF for URC8060 (KAMEMAK0) have a problem?

Post by t_for_tango »

Hi,

I've been having a problem when using the AUD device type on my URC8060 and I think there is a problem with the RDF file - KAMEMAK0.

The AUD device is type number 4, and the button "-/--{>10}" ($20) has been placed between buttons 4 ($19) and 5 ($1A) for only this device type.

Code: Select all

[DeviceTypes]
SAT/CBL = 1
TV      = 0
VCR     = 3
DVD     = 2
CD      = 5
AUD     = 4
.
.
[Buttons]
4=$19
5=$1A
6=$1B
7=$1C
8=$1D
9=$1E
0=$1F
"+100":-/--{>10}=$20
.
.
[ButtonMaps]
0 = ($1F, $15, $16, $17, $19, $1A, $1B, $1C, $1D, $1E), ($04, $05, $08), ($06, $07),
     $03, $12, $71, $72, $20, $50, $75, $0b, $0c, $0e, $0d, $46, $47, $44, $45, $43, $14, $29, $2a, $2c, $2b, $34, $27, $26, $13, $73, $4f, $2d, $2e, $2f, $30
1 = ($1F, $15, $16, $17, $19, $1A, $1B, $1C, $1D, $1E), ($04, $05, $08), ($06, $07),
     $03, $14, $29, $2a, $2c, $2b, $27, $52, $59, $60, $25, $68, $34, $0b, $0c, $0e, $0d, $71, $55, $26, $43, $20, $31, $10, $33, $0f, $35, $32, $72, $23, $24, $2d, $2e, $2f, $30
2 = ($1F, $15, $16, $17, $19, $1A, $1B, $1C, $1D, $1E), ($04, $05, $08), ($06, $07),
     $03, $14, $29, $2a, $2c, $2b, $31, $10, $33, $0f, $35, $32, $55, $23, $24, $26, $27, $65, $61, $58, $2d, $2e, $2f, $30
3 = ($1F, $15, $16, $17, $19, $1A, $1B, $1C, $1D, $1E), ($04, $05, $08), ($06, $07),
     $03, $31, $10, $33, $0f, $35, $32, $14, $29, $2a, $2c, $2b, $26, $27, $18, $28, $12, $20, $2d, $2e, $2f, $30
4 = ($1F, $15, $16, $17, $19, $20, $1A, $1B, $1C, $1D, $1E), ($04, $05, $08), ($06, $07),
     $03, $31, $10, $33, $0f, $35, $32, $43, $67, $76, $53, $23, $24, $69, $6a, $6c, $6b, $61, $54, $2d, $2e, $2f, $30
5 = ($1F, $15, $16, $17, $19, $1A, $1B, $1C, $1D, $1E), ($04, $05, $08), ($06, $07),
     $03, $31, $10, $33, $0f, $35, $32, $23, $24, $76, $61, $54, $43, $2d, $2e, $2f, $30
I've removed the extra $20 from my RDF and I no longer have a problem with AUD, ie.

Code: Select all

4 = ($1F, $15, $16, $17, $19, $1A, $1B, $1C, $1D, $1E), ($04, $05, $08), ($06, $07),
     $03, $31, $10, $33, $0f, $35, $32, $43, $67, $76, $53, $23, $24, $69, $6a, $6c, $6b, $61, $54, $2d, $2e, $2f, $30
Is this the right place in the forum to report it? And can someone fix it for a future release?

Regards,
Tango.
Nils_Ekberg
Expert
Posts: 1689
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2003 2:08 pm
Location: Near Albany, NY

Post by Nils_Ekberg »

This is the right place and I will take a look at what you have changed. Effectively you have just removed that button from the device completely.

What was the actual problem you were having?
t_for_tango
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 11:07 pm

Post by t_for_tango »

Thanks Nils.

Once I had loaded my device code I found that Vol+ didn't work and that Vol- turned the volume up. I found a number of other keys were doing the wrong functions, but that some of the numbers (1,2,3) were working correctly. It was like the keys were out by one button - which is what led me to look in the RDF.

RM showed that both the ">10" and "-/--{>10}" buttons were available (no * next to them). These are the same physical button, but with different labels. The pictures in the manual show that ">10" should be available in AUD mode.

So when I found that "-/--{>10}" was inbetween the 4 and 5 buttons, I thought I'd try removing it.

But I wanted to post to:
1 - make sure I was on the right track, and
2 - help anyone else in the future.

Cheers,
Tango.
The Robman
Site Owner
Posts: 22010
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2003 9:37 am
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:

Post by The Robman »

The numeric buttons are a fixed group, the group has to be the same for each device mode. Therefore, if you found an extra button in the numeric group for one of the device modes, it has to be a mistake. Good catch.
Rob
www.hifi-remote.com
Please don't PM me with remote questions, post them in the forums so all the experts can help!
Nils_Ekberg
Expert
Posts: 1689
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2003 2:08 pm
Location: Near Albany, NY

Post by Nils_Ekberg »

t_for_tango wrote: But I wanted to post to:
1 - make sure I was on the right track, and
2 - help anyone else in the future.

Cheers,
Tango.
You did good. I fixed it in the master and I am working on a new distribution of the RDF's so good timing.
Post Reply