JP1 Remotes

Hi all,

I have just acquired a Casio XJ-350 DLP Projector and IR decodes the signals as Gap-576-1688-40?

The below file contains two ir files with the learn't signals, my keymapping, and a pic of the remote.

https://www.hifi-remote.com/forums/dload ... le_id=4688

Cheers, Cam.

Any other experts looking at this should be sure to adjust the column widths in IR.exe's display of the decodes so they can see the Misc. column.

This looks like the same timing and structure as NEC1 and Aiwa, except these have 24 device bits, where NEC1 has 16 and Aiwa has 26.

I half remember there being other protocols that have this structure with numbers of bits other than 16 or 26. But I can't find any at the moment.

Any expert should be able to find an Aiwa executor and tweak it a little to transform it into an executor for these signals. I don't have time to do that myself today. (NEC1 is from a more complicated executor, so that wouldn't be a valid base). Or just reinvent from scratch with PB.

Note that DecodeIR thinks the last byte is the OBC, when actually the last byte is a check byte equal to 256 minus the OBC. So until I add decodeir support for this protocol, you'll need to subtract the decoded OBC from 256 to get the correct OBC.

Actually, I created a stripped down version of the NEC executor so it could be used as a starting point for situations just like this. The NEC PB file is here...

https://www.hifi-remote.com/forums/dload ... le_id=4480

I have created an un-tested KM file here...
https://www.hifi-remote.com/forums/dload ... le_id=4689

You guys are good, I have tested your KM file Robman and it works perfectly. Many thanks for taking the time.

Will this protocol get integrated into IRDecode.dll in due time ? It that how things usually go?

Cheers, Cam.

cweeks wrote:Will this protocol get integrated into IRDecode.dll in due time ? It that how things usually go?

The way things usually go is I put it off until I forget about it. I'll try to do better this time.

Anyone have a suggestion what this protocol should be named?

is there already a casio protocol?

johnsfine wrote:The way things usually go is I put it off until I forget about it.

A man after my own heart , like your style.

Is "Casio" too obvious for the name ? I couldn't see one in there already.