| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
eferz
Expert
Joined: 03 Jun 2010
Posts: 1078
Location: Austin, Texas
|
 Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 11:40 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| vickyg2003 wrote: | | Oh good, I'm glad we are on the same page. We may have two slightly different protocols here, and need to tweak the official 01DD protocol to run at 50hz. Thanks to you we can read the signal, and thanks to Rob we have the OBCs. However at this point its just academic, because we don't have a tester. |
So, I am curious if one of the earlier upgrades created for the Humax would meet the requirements for the Samsung? Or if I would be oversimplifying its creation by taking the current Humax (BixExp) protocol and Advance > Edit Protocol... > Protocol Data tab then changing the Frequency from 56.338 to 50.0 and creating bin files with it?
_________________
Remotes; JP1.2: Comcast URC-1067, JP1.3: Insignia NS-RC02U-10A, JP1.4 OARI06G, JP2.1: Cox URC-8820-MOTO (still trying to figure out how to make them self-aware.)
Last edited by eferz on Fri Mar 16, 2012 2:27 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Robman
Site Owner
Joined: 01 Aug 2003
Posts: 21234
Location: Chicago, IL
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
3FG
Expert
Joined: 19 May 2009
Posts: 3367
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 1:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I think the reason bnordman was interested in the C5270 was because the Humax and Samsung allegedly "use the same firmware". At least I read that when searching earlier, although I can't find that webpage now. So if someone is trying to control the C5270, I think it would be prudent to try both frequencies. Both the Humax and C5270 are used by KabelBW in Germany, and of course cable companies prefer to use the same remote protocols when practical. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
eferz
Expert
Joined: 03 Jun 2010
Posts: 1078
Location: Austin, Texas
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 2:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| 3FG wrote: | | I think the reason bnordman was interested in the C5270 was because the Humax and Samsung allegedly "use the same firmware". At least I read that when searching earlier, although I can't find that webpage now. So if someone is trying to control the C5270, I think it would be prudent to try both frequencies. Both the Humax and C5270 are used by KabelBW in Germany, and of course cable companies prefer to use the same remote protocols when practical. |
Sounds good enough for me.
I uploaded bin files exported from your RMDU, so they're ready for testing.
BIN file Instructions.
_________________
Remotes; JP1.2: Comcast URC-1067, JP1.3: Insignia NS-RC02U-10A, JP1.4 OARI06G, JP2.1: Cox URC-8820-MOTO (still trying to figure out how to make them self-aware.) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
The Robman
Site Owner
Joined: 01 Aug 2003
Posts: 21234
Location: Chicago, IL
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 9:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I just tracked down the thread in the Slingbox forum with a view to posting a notice about the upgrade, but Earl beat me to it! 
http://answers.slingbox.com/message/46091#46091
_________________
Rob
www.hifi-remote.com
Please don't PM me with remote questions, post them in the forums so all the experts can help! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
3FG
Expert
Joined: 19 May 2009
Posts: 3367
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 10:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Note that in the Slingbox forum, a post includes
| Quote: | | I think it's a problem with the german KabelBW-Receivers. Today i bought an other model (Humax iHD-Fox C) and inside there was the same remotecontrol (optic and function) as in my Samsung SMT-C5270. I also can use the Samsung remotecontrol for the new Humax. |
So either they both use the same frequency or at least one box is tolerant of the other frequency. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
File Section
Wiki
