| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
johnsfine
Site Admin
Joined: 10 Aug 2003
Posts: 4766
Location: Bedford, MA
|
 Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2003 12:23 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
The 1 byte version is in 15-2116, 15-2133, 8060, 8910 and 9960.
The 2 byte version is in 15-2103, 15-2104, 15-2107, rcu810, 4080 and 8011.
I think none of the other S3C80 models have PID 0111 at all. I have no clue about the non S3C80 models.
I would strongly prefer if you did NOT remove even useless protocols from the list in the RDF for remotes that have that protocol. Someone should put a varient name on the 0111 entries in the RDFs for models that have the 2 byte version. If you want to put some variant name like "obsolete" on them and then leave mention of that variant out of the protocols.ini file, you would get the same net result as removing 0111 from those rdfs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gfb107
Expert
Joined: 03 Aug 2003
Posts: 3411
Location: Cary, NC
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2003 12:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| johnsfine wrote: | | I would strongly prefer if you did NOT remove even useless protocols from the list in the RDF for remotes that have that protocol. Someone should put a varient name on the 0111 entries in the RDFs for models that have the 2 byte version. If you want to put some variant name like "obsolete" on them and then leave mention of that variant out of the protocols.ini file, you would get the same net result as removing 0111 from those rdfs. |
Fair enough.
_________________
-- Greg
Original RemoteMaster developer
JP1 How-To's and Software Tools
The #1 Code Search FAQ and it's answer (PLEASE READ FIRST) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gfb107
Expert
Joined: 03 Aug 2003
Posts: 3411
Location: Cary, NC
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
johnsfine
Site Admin
Joined: 10 Aug 2003
Posts: 4766
Location: Bedford, MA
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2003 1:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| gfb107 wrote: | | What about the URC-6131? |
Oops!
It uses the 1 byte version.
Once again I THINK none of the OTHER S3C80 models have PID 0111, but I've just proven my unreliability in such matters. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
The Robman
Site Owner
Joined: 01 Aug 2003
Posts: 21234
Location: Chicago, IL
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2003 3:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| johnsfine wrote: | | I would strongly prefer if you did NOT remove even useless protocols from the list in the RDF for remotes that have that protocol. Someone should put a varient name on the 0111 entries in the RDFs for models that have the 2 byte version. If you want to put some variant name like "obsolete" on them and then leave mention of that variant out of the protocols.ini file, you would get the same net result as removing 0111 from those rdfs. |
I agree. My original suggestion to Mark for KM was to have two Tivo protocols:
1) Tivo - This would use the official $0111 protocol id, and would serve up a protocol upgrade for remotes that either don't have $0111 or have the 2-byte version.
2) Tivo 2-byte - This version would be exclusively for people with remotes that contain the 2-byte version of the $0111 protocol. While it would let you enter the functions using 1-byte OBCs or EFCs, it would generate the additional byte for you. (This would be the same as "Tivo Official" in the older versions of KM).
Mark didn't like this idea because converting the first option from being a "hacked" protocol to an "official" protocol would mean that the FAV/SCAN hack would no longer be supported.
My suggestion, if this was deemed an important issue, was to create a third option called "Tivo SCAN" which would be an exact copy of the old "Tivo Hacked", which lets you program functions to the FAV/SCAN button, when present on your remote.
_________________
Rob
www.hifi-remote.com
Please don't PM me with remote questions, post them in the forums so all the experts can help! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mr_d_p_gumby
Expert
Joined: 03 Aug 2003
Posts: 1370
Location: Newbury Park, CA
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2003 10:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
PID 0111 is also in the Atlas... 
_________________
Mike England |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gfb107
Expert
Joined: 03 Aug 2003
Posts: 3411
Location: Cary, NC
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
johnsfine
Site Admin
Joined: 10 Aug 2003
Posts: 4766
Location: Bedford, MA
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2003 2:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| It's the new (1-byte) version. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
File Section
Wiki
