| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
xnappo
Expert
Joined: 30 Dec 2003
Posts: 861
|
 Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 4:57 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| vickyg2003 wrote: |
This is typical of the protocol variant issue. The older remotes don't have a MCE protocol, so we provide our smaller more efficient executor. When its built in, we want to use the built in version to save upgrade area.
. |
So what does the :2 indicate? In the other conflict thread we discussed adding :UEI and then later decided against it... Is :2 already a standard we have defined?
I realize that in my thread regarding Panasonic 0042 it was a completely different protocol rather than a variation - so I am guessing the problem is similar but not the same?
Thanks for your patience while I come up to speed,
xnappo |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vickyg2003
Site Admin
Joined: 20 Mar 2004
Posts: 7073
Location: Florida
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 5:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| xnappo wrote: | So what does the :2 indicate? In the other conflict thread we discussed adding :UEI and then later decided against it... Is :2 already a standard we have defined?
|
Yes. In simplest terms it means the executor has differnt parameters
_________________
Remember to provide feedback to let us know how the problem was solved and share your upgrades.
Tip: When creating an upgrade, always include ALL functions from the oem remote, even if you never plan on assigning them to a button. Complete function lists makes an upgrade more helpful to others.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
File Section
Wiki
