Does anyone see anything wrong with using the 'private area'
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 6:16 pm
I've been thinking of this as I try to finish up the 15-13x remotes.
1: there's a big block of memory used as a "private" area that I can't figure out if it's ever used
2: the special protocol code takes up a fair piece of upgrade memory when it's installed by default by the extender
So, I've been working on putting only the headers for the specials in the upgrade area and a JP to the code that resides in the private area.
I'm almost done with it, it wasn't that hard but I complicated it by changing the way that things got activated and deactivated and broke something. (sigh!) This should give back a fair amount of upgrade memory and use something that appears to be pretty much unused.
Any downsides to doing this?
If not, the published version of this extender will do this. If it works well, I'll go back and retrofit the Atlas extender to do this as well.
-bill
1: there's a big block of memory used as a "private" area that I can't figure out if it's ever used
2: the special protocol code takes up a fair piece of upgrade memory when it's installed by default by the extender
So, I've been working on putting only the headers for the specials in the upgrade area and a JP to the code that resides in the private area.
I'm almost done with it, it wasn't that hard but I complicated it by changing the way that things got activated and deactivated and broke something. (sigh!) This should give back a fair amount of upgrade memory and use something that appears to be pretty much unused.
Any downsides to doing this?
If not, the published version of this extender will do this. If it works well, I'll go back and retrofit the Atlas extender to do this as well.
-bill