Page 2 of 2
Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 2:09 pm
by xnappo
The Robman wrote:There have been a lot of RDFs added since the last RDF zip file was created. We have a new librarian now who is in the process of building a new master RDF zip file, but in the meantime you will need to download the RDF for your remote from here:
https://www.hifi-remote.com/forums/dload ... le_id=7425
Rob,
Just a note (we can move this over to the RDF thread if the discussion gets long) - I was basically treating the RDFs with no map or image as 'in development'. Is that incorrect?
Thanks,
xnappo
Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 2:27 pm
by vickyg2003
I believe this would use the same map and image as the 10820. Its identical except the word oneforall is all in black instead of Red and black. I beleive the keycodes/hex are the same too, although I haven't checked.
Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 2:32 pm
by xnappo
vickyg2003 wrote:I believe this would use the same map and image as the 10820. Its identical except the word oneforall is all in black instead of Red and black. I beleive the keycodes/hex are the same too, although I haven't checked.
Ok.. So in cases like that pretty much it isn't going to move from the development area unless someone tells me it is ready to be tested/released...
So ivmost - let me know how it works for you and if the maps/image are fine to just reuse.
Thanks!
xnappo
Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 2:41 pm
by ivmost
thank you - perfect!
Sorry - I didn't see some of the replies to the thread until I downloaded the RDF that Rob instructed. The data seemed to come up fine in IR now. Is there something [else] that you would like me to check?
Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 3:22 pm
by The Robman
xnappo wrote:Rob,
Just a note (we can move this over to the RDF thread if the discussion gets long) - I was basically treating the RDFs with no map or image as 'in development'. Is that incorrect?
Thanks,
xnappo
Yes, that is correct. However, I just downloaded this RDF with a view to adding a link to the URC-10820 set of images and I see that they're already there, so this one looks complete already.
Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 3:35 pm
by xnappo
ivmost wrote:thank you - perfect!
Sorry - I didn't see some of the replies to the thread until I downloaded the RDF that Rob instructed. The data seemed to come up fine in IR now. Is there something [else] that you would like me to check?
If you use RM to create your upgrades, let me know if it works fine there too.
Thanks!
xnappo