|
JP1 Remotes
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
The Robman Site Owner
Joined: 01 Aug 2003 Posts: 21237 Location: Chicago, IL |
Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2010 3:29 pm Post subject: PID $0046: Apex 1100W protocol issue |
|
|
Both RM and KM use PID $0146 for this protocol. The official UEI PID is $0046, so could we start using that instead? _________________ Rob
www.hifi-remote.com
Please don't PM me with remote questions, post them in the forums so all the experts can help!
Last edited by The Robman on Wed Oct 06, 2010 4:30 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gfb107 Expert
Joined: 03 Aug 2003 Posts: 3411 Location: Cary, NC |
|
Back to top |
|
|
The Robman Site Owner
Joined: 01 Aug 2003 Posts: 21237 Location: Chicago, IL |
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2010 7:01 pm Post subject: PID 0046: Apex 1100W protocol issue |
|
|
There are two versions of the UEI executor for this protocol.
Version 1 uses 2 fixed bytes where:
byte1 = device code
byte2 = shift OBC
Version 2 uses 3 fixed bytes where:
byte1 = device code
byte2 = device code complement
byte3 = shift OBC
RM currently assumes that all remotes have version 1. Therefore, protocols.ini needs to be modified to show two versions and the RDFs for the remotes that use the new variant need to be modified.
I show the following remotes as using the new version:
URC-7820 JP1.3
URC-8820N
Atlas 3000
Atlas 3032
Atlas 3033
Cox URC-7820 3046
DirecTV RC64
DirecTV RC65RB
Insignia URC-67100
RCA RCRP05B
Star Choice IRC 551 (URC-2050)
Vizio URC-66700 1033
Vizio URC-66700 3002
Vizio VUR8
KM still treats this executor as a hacked executor, as we did originally write it, so it provides a protocol upgrade all of the time. _________________ Rob
www.hifi-remote.com
Please don't PM me with remote questions, post them in the forums so all the experts can help! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mr_d_p_gumby Expert
Joined: 03 Aug 2003 Posts: 1370 Location: Newbury Park, CA |
Posted: Fri Oct 08, 2010 11:03 pm Post subject: Re: PID 0046: Apex 1100W protocol issue |
|
|
I checked my data, and there are three variants of the 0046 executors. One old version is 56 kHz and is obviously not the same protocol as the others. I suggest assigning the variants in the RDFs as follows:
0046:old
56 kHz, 3 fixed, 2 variable
(This is NOT an Apex 1100W protocol, and could be omitted from protocols.ini.)
RS 15-1918 O80a
RS 15-1919 O80a
RS 15-1925 O80a
URC-7070 O80a
0046 (default)
38 kHz, 2 fixed, 1 varable
Vizio VUR8 30273027
RS 15-2138 RS80RS80
URC-6131 PVR0PVR0
URC-6960 OK60OK60
URC-9960 B01 KASAKAS0
Atlas URC-1055 JP1.2 10251025
Catalyst 48 JP1.2 10531053
URC-6690 10361036
URC-8203 10261026
URC-8204 10231023
URC-8206 10211021
URC-8210 10481048
URC-6820/8820/10820 10631063
URC-39860 B00 10181018
0046:3
38 kHz, 3 fixed, 1 varable
The Robman wrote: | I show the following remotes as using the new version:
URC-7820 JP1.3
URC-8820N
Atlas 3000
Atlas 3032
Atlas 3033
Cox URC-7820 3046
DirecTV RC64
DirecTV RC65RB
Insignia URC-67100
RCA RCRP05B
Star Choice IRC 551 (URC-2050)
Vizio URC-66700 1033
Vizio URC-66700 3002
Vizio VUR8 | I agree, except for the Vizio URC-66700 1033, which does not have an 0046 executor according to my data.
Also, what is the signature of the URC-7820 JP1.3 remote you listed? Is it the same as the Cox URC-7820B 3046, because that is the only one I can find info on.
The Robman wrote: | KM still treats this executor as a hacked executor, as we did originally write it, so it provides a protocol upgrade all of the time. | I have this changed for the next version. A complication was with the fav/scan patch, but I managed to get KM to use the hacked version only when the patch is required (but still PID 0046). _________________ Mike England |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|