
That is the result from when I press the POWER button on the remote. What I am trying to do is figure out what code that would convert into if I wanted to use JP1 to emit the same frequency.
Any help is appreciated,
Thank you!
Moderator: Moderators

Which it do you mean? Some first version of the remote you're trying to build? Or the original TV remote you're trying to copy? Or what?zo0o0om wrote:Hey I am trying to make a TV remote from scratch, So far I have managed to build a receiver using a solar panel hooked up to my computer microphone jack, and audacity to record the infrared light that it emits.
There are easier ways to find out what IR signals your original remote transmits. But I still can give you advice on how to figure it out this way.That is the result from when I press the POWER button on the remote. What I am trying to do is figure out what code that would convert into if I wanted to use JP1 to emit the same frequency.
It's not likely that even in the rare instance that you have a sound card input that can sample at 96 KHz, that the analog bandwidth of the port extends far enough to make that work usefully. Sampling at 96 KHz which is the next higher commonly used sample rate available, in no way implies a bandwidth to half that.johnsfine wrote:Which it do you mean? Some first version of the remote you're trying to build? Or the original TV remote you're trying to copy? Or what?zo0o0om wrote:Hey I am trying to make a TV remote from scratch, So far I have managed to build a receiver using a solar panel hooked up to my computer microphone jack, and audacity to record the infrared light that it emits.
There are easier ways to find out what IR signals your original remote transmits. But I still can give you advice on how to figure it out this way.That is the result from when I press the POWER button on the remote. What I am trying to do is figure out what code that would convert into if I wanted to use JP1 to emit the same frequency.
You are looking at too slow a time scale to see the IR protocol and way too slow a scale to see the modulation frequency. Hopefully we can infer the modulation frequency once we know the protocol.
I don't know whether you have the audio sampling fast enough (and you're just displaying it at the wrong time scale) or whether you need to sample faster.
You highlighted a 23.447mS "frame" of the IR signal. You need to magnify the time scale so you can see details inside that frame.
From the zoomed out view you posted, it looks like RC5 protocol. If the IR receiver and the audio port were capable of instantaneous samples, you would need to be sampling at over 72Khz to see RC5 reliably. But more likely some part of the analog IR receive path has enough capacitance to smooth things out a little and you could see RC5 correctly at a much lower sample rate. Perfectly smoothed (exactly enough and not too much) you could see RC5 at 1Khz samples. But that's even more unlikely. So sampling closer to the 72Khz end of that range is safer.