New Device Lookup Tool

General JP1 chit-chat. Developing special protocols, decoding IR signals, etc. Also a place to discuss Tips, Tricks, and How-To's.

Moderator: Moderators

vickyg2003
Site Admin
Posts: 7109
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 12:19 pm
Location: Florida
Contact:

New Device Lookup Tool

Post by vickyg2003 »

Rob suggested that I put together some information that will be helpful to JP1 users who have lost their OEM remote or don't have a learning remote. If nothing can be found in the files section here, or at remotecentral, or at the manufacturer's site, this would be another resource of information to start an upgrade.

JP1 Device Lookup Tool
Remember to provide feedback to let us know how the problem was solved and share your upgrades.

Tip: When creating an upgrade, always include ALL functions from the oem remote, even if you never plan on assigning them to a button. Complete function lists makes an upgrade more helpful to others.
Tommy Tyler
Expert
Posts: 411
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Denver mountains

Post by Tommy Tyler »

Wow! My jaw hit the floor when I opened this tool the first time. It is beautifully designed, works fast, and seems to tell you everything you could want to know about a JP1 situation. I can't believe the amount of information that is packaged in this little utility.

Tommy
The Robman
Site Owner
Posts: 22062
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2003 9:37 am
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:

Post by The Robman »

I've added a link to the tool in the main menu above, to the right of the File Search link.
Rob
www.hifi-remote.com
Please don't PM me with remote questions, post them in the forums so all the experts can help!
vickyg2003
Site Admin
Posts: 7109
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 12:19 pm
Location: Florida
Contact:

Post by vickyg2003 »

Thanks, this is still a work in process, as I gather and clean my data.
Remember to provide feedback to let us know how the problem was solved and share your upgrades.

Tip: When creating an upgrade, always include ALL functions from the oem remote, even if you never plan on assigning them to a button. Complete function lists makes an upgrade more helpful to others.
ElizabethD
Advanced Member
Posts: 2348
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 12:07 pm

Post by ElizabethD »

Cool tool. Thanks Vicky :)
Liz
Tweeking 8910, HTPro/9811, C7-7800, 6131o, 6131n, AtlasOCAP-1056B01, RCA-RCRP05B and enjoying the ride :)
underquark
Expert
Posts: 874
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 4:58 am
Location: UK

Post by underquark »

Very, very good. I'm posting a link to it (if you don't mind) to the UK/Europe/(and Oz at the moment) Toppy site (Topfield PVRs) as people there are forever asking about alternative remotes, mainly for their PVR but also to control other devices. There are some fairly bright hardware and software people frequent that site and if I evangelise enough they might pop over here to offer help.
vickyg2003
Site Admin
Posts: 7109
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 12:19 pm
Location: Florida
Contact:

Post by vickyg2003 »

Sure Underquark. Please note that right now, you are ending up at my development site, but eventually Rob will be hosting this. The permanent site will be www.hifi-remote.com/jp1/lookup .
Remember to provide feedback to let us know how the problem was solved and share your upgrades.

Tip: When creating an upgrade, always include ALL functions from the oem remote, even if you never plan on assigning them to a button. Complete function lists makes an upgrade more helpful to others.
mdavej
Expert
Posts: 4656
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2003 7:08 am

Post by mdavej »

Vicky,

Brilliant tool. I have found a bug though. On your Device lookup results you have a column called Yes with several Yes entries in it. I'm guessing the header should be something else.

EDIT: One more thing. The RCA RCRP0FB remote model number should be RCRP05B
3FG
Expert
Posts: 3442
Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 11:48 pm

Post by 3FG »

mdavej,
I haven't seen this, and I've been using the tool quite a bit.

Do you have an example?
vickyg2003
Site Admin
Posts: 7109
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 12:19 pm
Location: Florida
Contact:

Post by vickyg2003 »

Dave, I tried to explain the YES column on the overview page.

If it is present, it says Yes, otherwise its blank.

I was looking for a small heading because screen real estate is premium.
I also left it blank if it wasn't present simply because for me its a lot easier to read if its there.

Would it be more user friendly if it spelled out "In?", "Exists" or "Found",. Do you want the word "No" spelled out too? I only spelled out the Yes but left the others blank make it easier for me to read, but if user's can't interpret it, what is the use of that?

I also think I might have to do something to make this more friendly to the users that have the LCD's and very explicit categories. It says Audio/xxxx, but with the fancy remotes you might have several categories to check if you are not quite sure if its a CD or RCV or AMP. If you look up the brands, it will give you more of a clue, like HOME or MISC or CD.... I have some URC8910s, but I have never used them. Might be a good time to look and see how this could be made more intuitive.
Remember to provide feedback to let us know how the problem was solved and share your upgrades.

Tip: When creating an upgrade, always include ALL functions from the oem remote, even if you never plan on assigning them to a button. Complete function lists makes an upgrade more helpful to others.
mathdon
Expert
Posts: 4767
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 8:53 am
Location: Cambridge, UK

Post by mathdon »

vickyg2003 wrote:Would it be more user friendly if it spelled out "In?", "Exists" or "Found",. Do you want the word "No" spelled out too? I only spelled out the Yes but left the others blank make it easier for me to read, but if user's can't interpret it, what is the use of that?
Since this was my mistake, on a page in which there were no Yes's so the column was blank, I do think a negative mark is needed as well. How about a tick and a cross, with a column heading of "In"?
vickyg2003 wrote:I also think I might have to do something to make this more friendly to the users that have the LCD's and very explicit categories.
Yes please. I thought the tool didn't cover Home Automation until I discovered it was classed as Audio. Not exactly intuitive to me! :) I think the problem is that you have made it so easy to use that people (me, at least!) don't think of needing instructions. And that's not damning with faint praise - it really is a wonderful tool.
_________________
Graham
mdavej
Expert
Posts: 4656
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2003 7:08 am

Post by mdavej »

Vicky,

I understand now that you explained it. Exists is clearer to me, if it fits ok. Yes or blank inside the results is fine the way it is. If I had read the overview page more carefully, I would have understood.

Another thing that might be a little confusing is if someone has a remote that takes 5 digit setup codes, where the first digit is the device type, how would they know what to append to the setup code? Maybe note somewhere indicating Cable = 0, TV = 1, Video = 2, Audio = 3. The only problem is I don't think any of the source info you're working with tells you if a remote uses 4 or 5 digit setup codes, does it? Only a few of the latest remotes like the radio shacks are the only one's using 5 digit device codes, AFAIK.


3FG,

Yes is the first column in all the search pages.
3FG
Expert
Posts: 3442
Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 11:48 pm

Post by 3FG »

mdavej wrote:.
3FG,
Yes is the first column in all the search pages.
That's what I get for using the pronoun "this". I was responding to the phrase "a column called Yes with several Yes entries in it". As far as I've seen, in Device lookup there is either one Yes entry or no entries in the Yes column.

Now I realize that you were commenting on the header. I too found this confusing at first, but I haven't been able to think of a short heading that's any better. Perhaps no heading and entries of green check marks or Red X's would work.
vickyg2003
Site Admin
Posts: 7109
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 12:19 pm
Location: Florida
Contact:

Post by vickyg2003 »

Dave wrote:
RCA RCRP0FB remote model number should be RCRP05B
Thanks I have trouble with 5 and F. They look too much alike, and they are both 6th in a sequence, so I often confuse them. (That probably gives you way too much information on how my brain works :lol: )
Graham wrote:
Since this was my mistake, on a page in which there were no Yes's so the column was blank, I do think a negative mark is needed as well. How about a tick and a cross, with a column heading of "In"?
I've changed the Yes column to "In?" and I've explicitly spelled out Yes,no so hopefully that will be more clear, although its a little cluttered for me.
Dave wrote:
Another thing that might be a little confusing is if someone has a remote that takes 5 digit setup codes, where the first digit is the device type, how would they know what to append to the setup code? Maybe note somewhere indicating Cable = 0, TV = 1, Video = 2, Audio = 3. The only problem is I don't think any of the source info you're working with tells you if a remote uses 4 or 5 digit setup codes, does it? Only a few of the latest remotes like the radio shacks are the only one's using 5 digit device codes, AFAIK.
I have a lot of that information. Anyplace where the header says "uses 5 digit setup codes", its because I know what the leading digits are. I know that for the RatShack and the Oneforall, but I don't know that for some of the OEM remotes. The remote user, would have better information than I have.

I am looking for ideas hear. I suppose after the Yes (oh yeah thats In?) column, I should give the Digit for the 5 digit codes, the Category for the LCD remotes, and the default button type for the standard 4 digit codes if I know them.
Remember to provide feedback to let us know how the problem was solved and share your upgrades.

Tip: When creating an upgrade, always include ALL functions from the oem remote, even if you never plan on assigning them to a button. Complete function lists makes an upgrade more helpful to others.
vickyg2003
Site Admin
Posts: 7109
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 12:19 pm
Location: Florida
Contact:

Post by vickyg2003 »

I changed my mind. Since it became apparent that the tool needed more information for the fancy remotes, I dropped the yes/in? column and replaced it with an "access method" column. If it says "n/a" the code is not in the remote. Otherwise it will specify the prefix digit for 5 digit remotes, the prefix letter for slingbox, the associated device key for the typical remote, or the selectable device type for LCD remotes.

For the OEM remotes, this information is not as accurate as I'd like it to be. If I haven't read the manual, I can't be sure how the setup codes are assigned.

I'm particularly confused by the dreambox remotes, and the Tivo remotes.
Remember to provide feedback to let us know how the problem was solved and share your upgrades.

Tip: When creating an upgrade, always include ALL functions from the oem remote, even if you never plan on assigning them to a button. Complete function lists makes an upgrade more helpful to others.
Post Reply