Teac-K protocol on Samsung remote - generating discretes?

If you already have a working setup code or upgrade, but are looking for discrete codes (for power, inputs, etc), please post here.

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
bmuirhead
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 2:46 am

Teac-K protocol on Samsung remote - generating discretes?

Post by bmuirhead »

Hi

I have spent three weekends trying to understand this so any help would be appreciated!!

I have a Samsung Receiver (AV-R710) and want to generate a full set of discrete codes to test. I am looking for discrete power on and power off keys.

I have used IRTool with DecodeIR.DLL to decode signals from my remote and it returns...
Protocol : Teac-K
Device : 0.4
OBC: 0
EFC: 181

I tried to use Makehex to generate a full set of discretes. There is no input file for Teac-K, although I have discovered that the protocol is a variation on Kaseikyo protocol so I used that, but the codes generated did not work.

I think I need to change the makehex parameters in the Kaseikyo.irp file but thats where I get stuck.

Can anyone help or show me another way of generating a full set of discrete codes?

many thanks
Bill
The Robman
Site Owner
Posts: 21910
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2003 9:37 am
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:

Post by The Robman »

Where are you getting the source data? Do you have a CCF file or something? If so, could you post a link to it (if it's on the web). If it's not on the web, please load a copy of it to the file section (Diagnosis Area) then post a link to it here.
Rob
www.hifi-remote.com
Please don't PM me with remote questions, post them in the forums so all the experts can help!
johnsfine
Site Admin
Posts: 4766
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2003 5:00 pm
Location: Bedford, MA
Contact:

Post by johnsfine »

I think I already answered Bill's question in the thread at remotecentral/...5315,1#8. I think that is a better place for Bill to look for more info.

But if any other JP1 experts want to discuss it here, you may want to read the previous thread first for context.
Post Reply