![JP1 Remotes Forum Index](templates/subSilver/images/logo_phpBB.gif) |
JP1 Remotes
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
seilae
Joined: 28 Aug 2004 Posts: 20
|
Posted: Sat Aug 28, 2004 3:20 pm Post subject: I need a Protocol for a kathrein remote control |
|
|
Hi,
I am using a URC-7552 and just learned all keys from my original Kathrein remote control (SAT) IR.exe 5.0 tells me for all buttons "GAP-some numbers"
the saved dump can be found at http://www.zweckstetter.de/Kathrein.IR
There is no matching protocol in keymap-master v8.24 or RemoteMaster v0.96a
What can I do ?
CU
Hubert |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
jon_armstrong Expert
Joined: 03 Aug 2003 Posts: 1238 Location: R.I.P. 3/25/2005 |
Posted: Sat Aug 28, 2004 3:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I can't get to it today, but it is like the NEC1 protocol without the repeat and with 24 data bits. D:4,~D:4, F:8,~F:8. I think there is probably a built in protocol for that, but if not, I can do it in a few minutes with Protocol Builder. _________________ -Jon |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
jon_armstrong Expert
Joined: 03 Aug 2003 Posts: 1238 Location: R.I.P. 3/25/2005 |
Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2004 11:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
I just posted an upgrade here for this but when I did I found another upgrade file already there. Anyway both use protocol ID $0066. IR does decode it although it is confusing. I put an explanation in the notes with the upgrade I did. _________________ -Jon |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
johnsfine Site Admin
Joined: 10 Aug 2003 Posts: 4766 Location: Bedford, MA |
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2004 9:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm trying to understand this one well enough to add to DecodeIR. I scanned all the CML files I have and found no instances of this. In CCF files I found two instances, two different Kathrein DSS models.
1) Should I assume this is just a Kathrein protocol and name it that? Or should I guess we'll see it elsewhere and temporarily call it "pid0066" until we know more?
2) Combining the available data from a few sources, it looks like most commands are
{38k,540}<1,-1|1,-3>(16,-8,D:4,~D:4,F:8,~F:8,1)
nonrepeating.
But a few (such as VOL+ and VOL-) are
{38k,540}<1,-1|1,-3>(16,-8,D:4,~D:4,F:8,~F:8,1,^105m,(16,-8,F:8,1,^105m)+)
Jon, does that look right? |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
jon_armstrong Expert
Joined: 03 Aug 2003 Posts: 1238 Location: R.I.P. 3/25/2005 |
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2004 12:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
johnsfine wrote: |
1) Should I assume this is just a Kathrein protocol and name it that? Or should I guess we'll see it elsewhere and temporarily call it "pid0066" until we know more? |
I don't have a very strong preference, but "pid0066" seems better for now.
Quote: | 2) Combining the available data from a few sources, it looks like most commands are
{38k,540}<1,-1|1,-3>(16,-8,D:4,~D:4,F:8,~F:8,1)
nonrepeating.
But a few (such as VOL+ and VOL-) are
{38k,540}<1,-1|1,-3>(16,-8,D:4,~D:4,F:8,~F:8,1,^105m,(16,-8,F:8,1,^105m)+)
Jon, does that look right? |
It looks good to me. I only saw the non repeating varaint, but I didn't manually decode but a few commands. It makes sense that it would repeat on those commands. Is the UEIC protocol set to do that? _________________ -Jon |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|