Search found 12 matches
- Mon Apr 26, 2010 2:09 am
- Forum: JP1 - Software
- Topic: IRScope 2.01 Beta posted
- Replies: 72
- Views: 74222
- Mon Apr 26, 2010 1:14 am
- Forum: JP1 - Software
- Topic: IRScope 2.01 Beta posted
- Replies: 72
- Views: 74222
IRScope loads all the dlls now!
Using DisplayLoadedModules I have compared two different computers (one that worked and other that didn't) and I have found that, in order to load all the dlls, the Microsoft C++ Runtime Library 2008 vcredist_x86.exe is required.

Using DisplayLoadedModules I have compared two different computers (one that worked and other that didn't) and I have found that, in order to load all the dlls, the Microsoft C++ Runtime Library 2008 vcredist_x86.exe is required.
- Wed Apr 21, 2010 6:09 am
- Forum: JP1 - Software
- Topic: IRScope 2.01 Beta posted
- Replies: 72
- Views: 74222
- Wed Apr 21, 2010 3:16 am
- Forum: JP1 - Software
- Topic: IRScope 2.01 Beta posted
- Replies: 72
- Views: 74222
I'm sure it's a silly question, but have you checked that ExchangeIR.dll and MakeHex.dll are actually present in the same folder as IRScope.exe? The loading command is identical for all three DLLs, so at present I cannot understand how one of them can load but the other two do not. Their absence ...
- Tue Apr 20, 2010 4:15 am
- Forum: JP1 - Software
- Topic: IRScope 2.01 Beta posted
- Replies: 72
- Views: 74222
- Tue Apr 20, 2010 1:01 am
- Forum: JP1 - Software
- Topic: IRScope 2.01 Beta posted
- Replies: 72
- Views: 74222
I've tried the new version in 8 different computers and it works flawlessly in four of them. In the others, I can't use the "Export" item and pressing "Summary" after a capture makes the program crashes.
I've been trying to solve this problem for a week but I have no clue.
Does anyone have the same ...
I've been trying to solve this problem for a week but I have no clue.
Does anyone have the same ...
- Thu Dec 24, 2009 10:26 am
- Forum: JP1 - Beginners
- Topic: Finding the protocol PID number for SAT 1657
- Replies: 7
- Views: 8468
- Thu Dec 24, 2009 7:24 am
- Forum: JP1 - Beginners
- Topic: Finding the protocol PID number for SAT 1657
- Replies: 7
- Views: 8468
- Mon Dec 21, 2009 1:56 am
- Forum: JP1 - Beginners
- Topic: Finding the protocol PID number for SAT 1657
- Replies: 7
- Views: 8468
- Fri Dec 18, 2009 3:14 am
- Forum: JP1 - Beginners
- Topic: Finding the protocol PID number for SAT 1657
- Replies: 7
- Views: 8468
Finding the protocol PID number for SAT 1657
Hi
Maybe it is a strange question, because my remote is working flawlessly.
But I am curious!
I'm triying to make a device upgrade for SAT 1657 (Siemens Gigaset MV740 PVR), but I can't find the protocol ID.
I can both use the native URC implementation in my remote (URC-7950)
and Rob's upgrade ...
Maybe it is a strange question, because my remote is working flawlessly.
But I am curious!
I'm triying to make a device upgrade for SAT 1657 (Siemens Gigaset MV740 PVR), but I can't find the protocol ID.
I can both use the native URC implementation in my remote (URC-7950)
and Rob's upgrade ...
- Wed Nov 11, 2009 5:29 am
- Forum: JP1 - Beginners
- Topic: Differences in protocol NEC1, device 0
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5496
NEC1 protocol
Thank you for the information.
I am making an upgrade for a device without the original remote, and I was confused about protocols. I have now more options to test.
I let you know if it works.
I am making an upgrade for a device without the original remote, and I was confused about protocols. I have now more options to test.
I let you know if it works.
- Tue Nov 10, 2009 2:57 am
- Forum: JP1 - Beginners
- Topic: Differences in protocol NEC1, device 0
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5496
Differences in protocol NEC1, device 0
I understand that NEC1 only has only two fixed device bytes.
Looking for a nec 1, device 0 compatible code I have found 00 FF FF and 00 FF 00 as a fixed device bytes.
What is the difference between 00 FF FF and 00 FF 00?
Thank you!
Looking for a nec 1, device 0 compatible code I have found 00 FF FF and 00 FF 00 as a fixed device bytes.
What is the difference between 00 FF FF and 00 FF 00?
Thank you!